a hint of the north polar cloud, but no hexagon
can see Cassini's division and the maybe Encke minimum
the images are taken by using a video camera, stacking thousands of short long exposures
allowing processing software to select the images least distorted by seeing
stacking thousands of images in this way gives a much more sharp image
in theory one can upsample the video by 2x to get better magnification
so i decided to do a test, comparing and upsampled image
with an image using a 2.5x barlow to give more magnification
but requiring longer exposure.
which will be better?
larger magnification with longer exposure
or shorter exposure eliminating seeing effects?
2.5x barlow:
compare the Encke minimum and colored bands
close, but i think the barlow winsthough the seeing wasn't really sufficient for either
No comments:
Post a Comment