lunar libration

After the recent lunar eclipse, I attempted to line up a before and after image, superimposing the full moon from the night before with the eclipsed moon just before sunrise, and found something odd: they don't match.  it wasn't just a matter of lining things up--which i can correct, or size--which i expected to be minor, but the surface of the moon itself appeared to have rotated:

lunar libration, full moon at sunset to eclipsed moon at sun rise 1/31/18

In a moment of doubt, i feared that a processing bug was creating horrific artifacts, since i know that the moon is tidally locked to the earth (it doesn't rotate, the same side always faces us).  then i recalled the term lunar libration, referring to minor rotation in the appearance of the moon relative to the earth.  a number of factors contribute to this, but the easiest to grasp is that as the earth rotates, the observer's location shifts.  in this case, viewing the moon at sunset and then sunrise, i had moved by the diameter of the planet earth, explaining why the moon appeared to rotate slightly.  

Here's a really cool animation of lunar libration throughout a lunar month:

wikipedia lunar libration animation

as well as a more in depth explanation of the causes of lunar libration:

wikipedia

imaging details:

close up:

ZWO ASI120MC, Takahashi FS-60C at native F/5.9, 355 mm.

skywatcher star adventurer tracking mount  

full moon .325 ms exposure 12 seconds captured at ~17 fps

eclipsed moon 152.6 ms exposure 68 second capture at 6 fps

13:24 UTS

1/31/2018

Eastbluff, CA

abell 33, the diamond ring nebula

Here's a spherical planetary nebula with a bright foreground star conveniently superimposed on the edge, providing the "diamond" for the ring:

Abell 33, the diamond ring nebula OIII RGB
click on image for full size

The small blue star in the center is the white dwarf creating the nebula.  A close up of the RGB version shows a hint of a second star to the lower right.  This is likely another superimposed star or a "visual double", as a double central star should (in theory with rare exception) create a bipolar, rather than a spherical nebula.  

central star of Abell 33
RGB, upsampled 2x

apparently an open issue in astronomy is whether the percentage of planetary nebulae double central stars matches the percentage of doubles in the general stellar population.  there are several recent surveys which address this, and may confirm my supposition, but i don't have access to them.  

The binary fraction of planetary nebula central stars - II. A larger sample and improved technique for the infrared excess search

The binary fraction of planetary nebula central stars: the promise of VPHAS+



The RGB image shows two other things:
1. how faint the nebula is, as it was barely detectable on the RGB image, requiring narrow band filters to bring it out.
2. how bright the "diamond" star is as it created a "bloom" (bright white artifact to the right of the brightest star).  
should have shot the RGB unbinned to better resolve the central star and minimize blooming.  

I did take a few trial Ha shots, but got only extremely faint signal in a circle, matching the OIII, but without detail.  

Image details:
8" LX200R, SX Trius 694 binned x2 to 0.8"/px,
astrodon 3nm OIII, RGB E SERIES GEN-II
ASA DDM60
R 18x4 minutes, G 16x4 minutes, B 8x4 minutes
OIII 24x20 minutes.
4/14/17-5/1/17, bortle white skies
eastbluff, CA

super blue blood moon

here's the rising full moon on the evening of 1/30/18 followed by the setting super blue blood moon from the next morning (click on images for full size):

darker version with a bit more detail:

The full moon above is sharper than the eclipsed moon for several reasons:
1. the eclipsed moon was lower in the sky, therefore subject to more atmospheric turbulence
2. the faint eclipsed moon required longer exposure (500x), also increasing the effect of atmospheric turbulence.  

shot this one in lazy mode.  my garage faces west, so i set up my imaging rig the night before, taking a quick image of the full moon to make sure everything was working.  then moved the equipment into the garage facing west, closed the door and went to bed.  
got up and 5 AM, opened the door to my "observatory" and voila super blue blood moon over my neighbors house:

I'd checked the framing with the setting moon the week before.  this image took a fair amount of work in photoshop as the street lights gave the house a strange green tint. there was also star trailing evident over only 20 seconds (seen below), so i pasted the telescopic version over the moon image in the wide field DSLR image.  

imaging details:

close up:

ZWO ASI120MC, Takahashi FS-60C at native F/5.9, 355 mm.
skywatcher star adventurer tracking mount  

full moon .325 ms exposure 12 seconds captured at ~17 fps

eclipsed moon 152.6 ms exposure 68 second capture at 6 fps

13:24 UTS

wide field:

Nikon D-60, AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR, f/5.6 55 mm 20" iso 400

1/31/2018

Eastbluff, CA

Copernicus infra red

Here's a close up shot of copernicus, one of the most photogenic craters on the moon with its terraced walls and central peaks: 

Copernicus 9/10/16 infra red filter
click for moon-walk size

it's easily visible to the naked eye here:

7/8/17 IR/UV block filter

Interestingly, the crater was named by a jesuit at a time when church doctrine opposed the heliocentric model.  The crafty jesuit justified naming such a prominent crater after the father of the heliocentric model by noting that the astronomer was placed in oceanus procellarum, the "ocean of storms". wikipedia link with more information about the crater

The image of the crater was taken with an infra red filter and a telescope that is "mostly" a reflector (mirrors).  it was a test shot which proved that the IR filter was sharper than standard visible filters.  more on that in this post on jupiter.  
Interestingly, the full disk image was taken with a filter that blocks infra red.  why? it was taken with a refractor.  refractors use lenses to bend light.  since infrared light bends less than visible light (the same phenomenon that made it desirable in the previous image), it doesn't focus well in refractors, creating a blurry image.  


Technical notes:
Copernicus: celestron nexstar 8 GPS (8" SCT on a wedge)
ZWO ASI120MM-S
captures with firecapture @ ~58 fps
stacked in autostakkert, Drizzle 3x, then reduced to 1.5x, sharpened in registax 6
9/10/2016
Full disk: DMK 51 and the tiny tak, Takahashi FS-60C, 60 mm aperture at f/4.2 with a reducer.  The field of view is approximately 96x72 arc minutes.  1 minute video capture at approximately 12 fps, aligned in autostakkert, wavelets in registax.
7/8/2017
Eastbluff, CA

Sunday Sundogs and a pillar

saw a pair of Sundogs while running in the back bay today.  pointed them out to everyone i passed.  most thought i was crazy, but one couple shouted a "thank you" after they found it.

Sundogs 1/14/18

Sundogs are caused by light refracting off hexagonal ice crystals.  if they are random a halo is formed, if they are horizontal, two spots are seen on either side.  Here's a nice explanation.  

Here's a phenomenal example of a double solar halo with sunddogs taken from a ski slope in sweden:

https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap180101.html

speaking of solar images, here's an Ha image of a "straight pillar"--a form of solar prominence:

Image details:

sundogs:

cellphone Droid turbo
Eastbluff, CA 1/14/18

Ha:

Lunt 60 PT 

ASI 290 MM camera

20 second video 183 fps

Shutter=5.0 ms
Eastbluff, CA 1/4/18

2017 eclipse experiance

Then totality.
the sky darkened, but was still visibly blue
i viewed the eclipse through light cloud cover
perhaps making this experience a bit different, with less darkening of the sky.

i elected to watch the first diamond ring looking down at my laptop to protect dark adaptation.  while looking down i noticed shadowbands sweeping along the sidewalk then,

OH MY GOD, THERE IS A HUGE BLACK HOLE IN THE SKY WITH A HALO OF LIGHT AROUND IT

i picked up my canon 15x50 image stabilized binoculars to get a closer look at the corona.  after a second of viewing i thought something like "why do i have a piece of glass between me and a direct view of god?" and put the binoculars down...an alarm reminded me when it was time to get back to imaging

it wasn't the darkness of the sky that overwhelmed, but rather the black hole in the twilight sky which seems to lead to another universe/reality... 

click on image for full size

another alarm goes off and i look up to catch the final diamond ring.  a pinpoint of light appears at the right edge of the black hole in the sky, brightening steadily until it is too brilliant to look at. 

last alarm, filters back on.





The image above is a remarkably accurate portrayal of the visual experience (to my eye).  the main shortcoming is that it's difficult to portray the scale of the event.  try to envision the black circle in the image at the size of a full moon rising, dominating the horizon.  interestingly, it was the combination of two mediocre images (both shown in previous posts): an over exposed cell phone shot and an out of focus telephoto image with my DSLR.  having succeeded in combining a color image with my telescopic view, i tried combining these two on a lark.  after two minutes of aligning the spikes of the corona in the two images, i adjusted the opacity and my jaw dropped, bingo.  

while in casper for the eclipse, i attended a talk by archeoastronomer J. McKim Malville at the astronomical league conference.  He has studied a number of stonehenge-like sites, one of which featured a petroglyph (stone carving) of what appeared to be a total solar eclipse with a coronal ejection mass.  After seeing an eclipse, i can see what motivated these strucutres.  

Lastly, thanks to Ellen Pothier for having the foresight to bring corona:

Otherwise,  there'd be a bud light joke here

Image details:
-sun and corona:
Nikon D-60, AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR, f/5.6 300 mm 1/20" iso 400
Landscape:

-cell phone, Droid Turbo ;)

Casper Wyoming
42,50.9694N 106,15.5688W
8/21/2017

2017 eclipse color composite

digression:

since the human visual system is more accurate for luminance (black and white) than color, one can combine a low resolution color image with a high resolution black and white image without any perceived loss of detail.  this phenomenon is often exploited in image printing, processing, recording, display etc.  wikipedia link.  

applying this concept to eclipse imaging, i had hoped to combine a lower resolution color digital camera image (DSLR) with a sharp black and white image from the telescopic video.  as mentioned previously, i blew the focus on my DSLR shot.  fortunately, my eclipse neighbor, James Pothier, sent me his DSLR image from the same location and time.  Jim and wife Ellen hail from Massachusetts.  7 for 7 eclipse viewers, they set up right next to me at the Residence inn, Casper, Wyoming.  I combined the color from his DSLR shot with my black and white image, aligning on the colored prominences and voila:

here's the color applied to my previous composite combining multiple exposures:

click for full size

for reference here's my DSLR shot with focus blown (many thanks to the Pothiers):

Image details:
-totality wider field:
Nikon D-60, AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR, f/5.6 300 mm 1/20" iso 400

-Pothier image

Nikon D300, f/6.3 ISO 200 1/640 -1step exposure bias 380 mm.

-telescopic view:
DMK 51 web cam, Takahashi FS-60C, 60 mm aperture at f/4.2 with a reducer, 252mm. Skywatcher star adventurer tracking mount.  Fotga IR/UV cut filter.  The full field of view is approximately 96x72 arc minutes with a resolution of 3.6"/px.  video capture at 12 fps, aligned in autostakkert, wavelets in registax.
Casper Wyoming
42,50.9694N 106,15.5688W
8/21/2017